In the eye of the (dead) beholder

Christopher Pinney’s article provides an interesting point of connection between the idea of “essence” in portrait photography, and the typology of the multiple frames.  In the former there seems to be a certain redemption from the perils of the latter in that it is set adrift from a project; it is free to wander the boundaries of the individual: whether the individual is thought in the multiple of happenstance narrative, or the singular of the appearance of what Benjamin calls the now time.  So, I just wanted to pick up something specific from this project, which fascinated me.  Pinney mentions the case of optographic experiments in criminological projects in the nineteenth century.  It was popularly thought, it seems, that a photograph might be able to capture the reflection of the murderer in the eye of the victim.  I like the correspondence then, between the photograph as freezing time, and death as distilling the outside of the body for all time.  So we might want to think about how the limits of photography were being negotiated in the early period, and what it might be possible to capture.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: